Conclusion
Although recognizing that the family is only one cause among many of aggressive
      and delinquent behavior, we have emphasized its primacy because of its
      importance in the development and early control of aggressiveness, which
      is one of the strongest predictors of delinquency. We also recognize that,
      for some adolescents, families may not be available, perhaps because of
      exhaustion of resources, a long placement history, chronic maltreatment,
      or parent pathology. To work effectively with families, social workers
      must believe in their inherent capabilities and search for and support
      family strength. At the same time, we must recognize the limit of family
      intervention with delinquents and the need for supplementary service and
      systems.
      We do believe that, when adolescents have families that can be mobilized,
      their involvement is vital to develop any comprehensive intervention plan.
      Early intervention is key, given the relative stability of early aggressive
      behavior and its relationship to delinquency, and a social learning approach
      incorporating parent training in family management strategies has demonstrated
      efficacy. Explicit efforts to enhance parent-child positive involvement
      and the affiliative bond may be necessary where this does not occur as
      a result of decreases in aggressive behavior. In addition, parent training
      should be supplemented with interventions for strengthening family communication
      and problem-solving skills to address stress both within the family and
      outside of it. The most promising trends in family-based interventions
      are enhanced interventions, or the multisystemic model, which attend to
      the social context of the adolescent and family. A broad conception of
      intervention with families, one that takes a supportive stance and considers
      parents as partners in advocacy for their child's needs, is important to
      coordinating needed intervention.
      We have suggested that prevention and intervention must address multiple
      targets at multiple system levels, again highlighting the relationship
      of the family to these targets and systems. Intervention that focuses solely
      on microprocesses in families will generally be inadequate to address the
      complex problems that juvenile delinquency presents, not the least because
      delinquent behavior itself becomes a force driving interaction, further
      contributing to family disorganization and distress. Programs that target
      multiple predictors of delinquency are particularly promising. Furthermore,
      because delinquent adolescents are seen in many different service systems,
      there is a strong need for coordinating children's service system. The
      current focus on families in the juvenile justice system calls for a broadly
      defined, coordinated, community-based system of care that addresses multiple
      issues and employs our best knowledge about effective family intervention.
        
       

